Round 2 -FIGHT!!! and why Gary Oldman should be in office

   It's not enough for him to make our lives more miserable then they already are by cutting our access to the money that makes our society bearable to live in and smearing his smug inbred face on every available surface, now he seems to think that making speeches about how he thinks immigration should be stripped back to the 1980's standard in areas with high levels of political racism are a terribly good idea. Recent news from Halifax shows the current political climate.

   What is he trying to do? Start Brixton 1980 part 2?

   Now here is the thing - I am actually all for a decreeing level of immigration control and I believe every country should be allowed to set their own levels accordingly, especially in a time when the country has, supposedly, no money, how can we afford to take on more people to house and give job's to when those whom are native here are finding it nearly impossible to secure a job, never mind money to leave the country to find work else where? It's a bloody irony but one which I'm not finding all that funny.

What I'm not for is the old tricks the Con's pull out of their bag every time they want to secure their seats in their local constituencies - to say they are flogging a dead horse with this one is like saying that the Christians 'go on a bit' about Jesus.

   The irritating thing also is that this is a government which we as a country actually wanted. We wanted some one to take charge of our finances and get us back on the up and up ASAP - Cameron is doing that: The kind that feels like our pocket money has been taken from us just because Daddy's company has gone under [and like children we're sulking about it].

  
   We wanted some one to cut the levels of bureaucracy - Cameron is doing that - sort of. Bureaucracy is a hell of a thing to shed once it's been implemented. It's a lot more complicated then, say, getting the document with the law on and throwing it in the waste paper bin. It's closer to surgery; Prepare it for a full examination. open it up to see the inner, grizzly bits, cut through the red tape to get to the heart of the problem, cutting out that troublesome bit of bureaucracy that people don't like very much and . . . that's it, isn't it?

   No, not unless you want your patient to bleed out everywhere, squealing like a piggy in a slaughter house - You forgot to closer her back up, you fool! You cant just cut out cancer and walk away. You need to sow the traumatised flesh back together again in the most applicable and effective ways for the body to continue functioning whilst healing with the passage of time [and in this case, light amendments]

   On a slightly different note, has any one ever noticed that David Cameron looks similar to Gary Oldman's Dracula? Seriously, check out the shadow:

David Cameron in his private office

Gary Oldman as Dracula

So versatile, Gary Oldman should be in office!

May it never be said that the Tories aren't vampires!